Chiang Mai University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Thailand
Founded
1964
Type
Education
ROR
05m2fqn25
FWUR Rank#813 globally (of 4.980)#3 in Thailand
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 55,9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 526–1.735 (1.209 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#526, most generous score) and ARWU (#801, harshest score).

QS
526[src]of 1.462
RUR
528[src]of 1.128
ARWU
801[src]of 996
CWUR
884[src]of 1.929
THE
1.001[src]of 2.119
SCImago
1.735[src]of 4.699
FWUR
813of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS8,2
  • THE3
  • ARWU36,2
  • CWUR1,6
  • RUR2,6
  • SCImago7,2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
41,4ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
58,4QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
53,8CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #813 · 55.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
41.4
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
58.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
53.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 55.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#884
cwur.org
RUR2025
#528
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1735
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #2160 → #1768 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲216#831QS▲34#571THE▲200#801ARWU#601CWUR▲19#894RUR▲123#550SCImago▲913#1768
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2160
2010#401#2236
2011#501#2317
2012#501#2305
2013#551#534#2025
2014#871#506#2083
2015#501#818#1940
2016#551#601#808#626#1722
2017#551#601#846#600#1671
2018#551#801#801#793#589#2356
2019#651#801#801#924#669#1206
2020#601#1001#901#930#607#3353
2021#601#1001#901#944#552#3336
2022#601#1001#701#942#531#2804
2023#605#1001#601#913#673#2681
2024#571#801#601#894#550#1768

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Khon Kaen University1179.0
2Mahidol University430.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources