Charles Darwin University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Australia
Founded
2003
Type
Education
ROR
048zcaj52
FWUR Rank#867 globally (of 4.980)#28 in Australia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 49,9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 401–3.644 (3.243 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#401, most generous score) and SCImago (#3.644, harshest score).

THE
401[src]of 2.119
RUR
483[src]of 1.128
QS
584[src]of 1.462
ARWU
601[src]of 995
CWUR
1.112[src]of 1.929
SCImago
3.644[src]of 4.699
FWUR
867of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS6,9
  • THE27,9
  • CWUR10,9
  • RUR4
  • SCImago30,8

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
31,1ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
70,6QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
49,8CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2023/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #867 · 49.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
31.1
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
70.6
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
49.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 49.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#1112
cwur.org
RUR2025
#483
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#3644
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1808 → #3671 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲114#893QS▲105#601THE▼50#401ARWUNo dataCWUR▲33#1064RUR▲83#488SCImago▲853#3671
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1808
2010#342#1808
2011#364#1939
2012#301#455#2042
2013#471#351#543#2346
2014#351#910#512#2332
2015#551#301#942#527#2054
2016#551#251#902#494#2031
2017#551#251#956#466#2917
2018#651#301#521#3562
2019#651#501#1056#520#2027
2020#651#501#1111#476#4907
2021#701#501#901#1088#4590
2022#701#501#801#1100#512#4515
2023#706#351#601#1097#571#4524
2024#601#401#1064#488#3671

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Canberra871.0
2University of Southern Queensland827.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources