California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1901
Type
Education
ROR
001gpfp45
FWUR Rank#1.971 globally (of 4.980)#264 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 25,5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 801–3.594 (2.793 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#801, most generous score) and QS (#1.201, harshest score).

THE
801[src]of 1.251
QS
1.201[src]of 1.462
CWUR
1.402[src]of 1.929
SCImago
3.594[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.971of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS5,6
  • CWUR3,8
  • SCImago0

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
23,5SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
27QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
27,4CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2019/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,971 · 25.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
23.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
27
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
27.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 25.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR2025
#1402
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#3594
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2875 → #4688 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲71#2190QS▲14#1201THENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▼48#1297RURNo dataSCImago▲543#4688
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2875
2010#3079
2011#3293
2012#3060
2013#3189
2014#3287
2015#3154
2016#3301
2017#3461
2018#801#3070
2019#801#1207#2246
2020#1182#4567
2021#1179#5241
2022#1203#5595
2023#1215#1249#5231
2024#1201#1297#4688

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Clark University1975.0
2Tennessee Tech University1977.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources