Bharathiar University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
India
Founded
1982
Type
Education
ROR
04fht8c22
FWUR Rank#2.817 globally (of 4.980)#142 in India
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 9,2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–5.918 (5.317 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#601, most generous score) and SCImago (#5.918, harshest score).

THE
601[src]of 2.119
ARWU
901[src]of 993
CWUR
1.755[src]of 1.929
SCImago
5.918[src]of 4.699
FWUR
2.817of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE62,6
  • CWUR0
  • SCImago9,1

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
4,7ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
71,7THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
9,1CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2020/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,817 · 9.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
4.7
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
71.7
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
9.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 9.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
CWUR2025
#1755
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#5918
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3051 → #5427 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼215#2444QSNo dataTHE▲200#601ARWUNo dataCWUR▼39#1704RURNo dataSCImago▲306#5427
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3051
2010#2982
2011#3063
2012#3097
2013#3195
2014#3077
2015#3321
2016#3413
2017#2900
2018#3019
2019#901#1765#1595
2020#901#1641#4931
2021#801#1623#5305
2022#801#1661#5826
2023#801#1665#5733
2024#601#1704#5427

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Ashoka University2821.0
2Indian Statistical Institute2896.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources