AgroParisTech

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
France
Founded
2007
Type
Education
ROR
02kbmgc12
FWUR Rank#1.017 globally (of 4.980)#50 in France
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 47,6/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 495–2.461 (1.966 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#495, most generous score) and ARWU (#701, harshest score).

CWUR
495[src]of 1.982
ARWU
701[src]of 996
SCImago
2.461[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.017of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • SCImago0

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
38,7ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
75,1CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2019/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,017 · 47.6
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
38.7
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
75.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 47.6 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2019
#495
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#2461
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1038 → #1949 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼98#791QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▼159#1949
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1038
2010#933
2011#1004
2012#941
2013#1000
2014#826
2015#928
2016#778
2017#719
2018#701#487#982
2019#701#495#510
2020#1135
2021#1043
2022#1230
2023#1790
2024#1949

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Université Paris 131018.0
2École des Ponts ParisTech1016.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources