Wuhan Institute of Technology

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
China
Founded
1972
Type
Education
ROR
04jcykh16
FWUR Rank#1.425 globally (of 4.980)#203 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 34,2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 701–2.887 (2.186 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#1.033, most generous score) and RUR (#968, harshest score).

ARWU
701[src]of 996
RUR
968[src]of 1.128
CWUR
1.033[src]of 1.929
SCImago
2.887[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.425of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU4,4
  • CWUR12,4
  • RUR19,9
  • SCImago4,4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
34,2ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
30,4CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,425 · 34.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
34.2
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
30.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 34.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#1033
cwur.org
RUR2025
#968
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2887
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3631 → #2880 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼499#1745QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU#901CWUR▲63#1151RUR▲188#901SCImago▼523#2880
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3631
2010#3923
2011#4107
2012#4279
2013#4519
2014#4544
2015#4165
2016#4320
2017#2765
2018#2875
2019#1569#1748
2020#1494#4098
2021#1406#3432
2022#1288#3338
2023#1214#1089#2357
2024#901#1151#901#2880

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Harbin University of Science and Technology1410.0
2Chengdu Medical College1441.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources