Wake Forest University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1834
Type
Education
ROR
0207ad724
FWUR Rank#448 globally (of 4.980)#107 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 73,3/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 131–1.119 (988 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#131, most generous score) and QS (#791, harshest score).

RUR
131[src]of 1.128
CWUR
271[src]of 1.929
THE
401[src]of 2.119
ARWU
501[src]of 996
QS
791[src]of 1.462
SCImago
1.119[src]of 4.699
FWUR
448of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS27,3
  • THE7,8
  • ARWU23,5
  • CWUR12,7
  • RUR15,2
  • SCImago2,9

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
63ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
63,5QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
87,2CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #448 · 73.3
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
63
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
63.5
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
87.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 73.3 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#271
cwur.org
RUR2025
#131
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1119
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #385 → #1038 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼93#443QS▼261#701THE▼50#401ARWU#501CWUR▲2#260RUR▼29#151SCImago▼5#1038
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#203
2006#201
2007#203
2008#201
2009#303#385
2010#233#301#396
2011#272#90#301#412
2012#317#162#301#187#399
2013#329#190#301#202#382
2014#180#301#145#194#366
2015#338#201#401#159#198#373
2016#461#201#401#155#166#395
2017#401#201#501#154#176#389
2018#411#251#501#239#188#541
2019#387#251#401#224#200#290
2020#398#201#401#222#175#674
2021#380#251#401#237#817
2022#429#301#501#257#191#848
2023#440#351#501#262#122#1033
2024#701#401#501#260#151#1038

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Florida State University442.0
2George Mason University457.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources