Vilniaus Universitetas

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Lithuania
Founded
1579
Type
Education
ROR
03nadee84
FWUR Rank#774 globally (of 4.980)#1 in Lithuania
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 57,4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 446–2.573 (2.127 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#446, most generous score) and SCImago (#2.573, harshest score).

QS
446[src]of 1.462
RUR
467[src]of 1.062
ARWU
501[src]of 996
CWUR
748[src]of 1.929
THE
801[src]of 2.119
SCImago
2.573[src]of 4.699
FWUR
774of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS11,8
  • THE4,5
  • ARWU8
  • CWUR3,5
  • SCImago12,5

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
47,5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
65,9QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
58,7CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2024/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #774 · 57.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
47.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
65.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
58.7
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 57.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#748
cwur.org
RUR2024
#467
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2573
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #2664 → #2378 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼31#804QS▼72#473THE#801ARWU#501CWUR▼13#741RUR▲80#467SCImago▲370#2378
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2664
2010#485#2816
2011#551#480#2907
2012#501#526#2764
2013#601#596#2839
2014#838#569#2655
2015#551#791#559#2298
2016#501#601#739#607#2652
2017#481#601#701#742#552#1435
2018#401#601#601#748#539#1573
2019#488#801#601#703#514#674
2020#458#801#701#696#467#1931
2021#423#801#701#687#431#2277
2022#400#801#701#699#456#2541
2023#401#801#501#728#547#2748
2024#473#801#501#741#467#2378

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Kauno technologijos universitetas1119.0
2Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas1145.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources