University of the Philippines Manila

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Philippines
Founded
1908
Type
Education
ROR
01rrczv41
FWUR Rank#2.924 globally (of 4.980)#8 in Philippines
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 13,1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 380–5.056 (4.676 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#380, most generous score) and SCImago (#5.056, harshest score).

QS
380[src]of 683
CWUR
1.677[src]of 1.929
SCImago
5.056[src]of 4.699
FWUR
2.924of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR6,6
  • SCImago6,6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
44,5QS

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
13,1CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2013/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,924 · 13.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
44.5
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
13.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 13.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

THE
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1677
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#5056
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3939 → #7190 (2013–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼125#2749QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▲50#1637RURNo dataSCImago▼997#7190
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010#314
2011#332
2012#348
2013#380#3939
2014#4386
2015#4229
2016#3871
2017#4849
2018#4344
2019#1370#2529
2020#1661#5947
2021#1734#6245
2022#1711#6787
2023#1687#6193
2024#1637#7190

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources