University of Roehampton

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United Kingdom
Founded
1841
Type
Education
ROR
043071f54
FWUR Rank#1.582 globally (of 4.980)#96 in United Kingdom
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 0/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 801–5.137 (4.336 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#801, most generous score) and CWUR (#1.967, harshest score).

THE
801[src]of 2.119
CWUR
1.967[src]of 1.928
SCImago
5.137[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.582of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE31,1
  • SCImago31,1

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
62,2THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
0CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2022/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,582 · 0
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
62.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
0
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 0 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2022
#1967
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#5137
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2600 → #4739 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼61#1645QSNo dataTHE#801ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▼432#4739
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2600
2010#2479
2011#2396
2012#2501
2013#2797
2014#2546
2015#2590
2016#3487
2017#601#3561
2018#601#4328
2019#801#1899#2809
2020#801#1816#4294
2021#801#1890#4682
2022#801#1967
2023#801#4307
2024#801#4739

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Glasgow Caledonian University1552.0
2University of Wolverhampton1519.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources