University of Oregon

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1876
Type
Education
ROR
0293rh119
FWUR Rank#705 globally (of 4.980)#144 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 61,1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 401–2.033 (1.632 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#401, most generous score) and QS (#751, harshest score).

THE
401[src]of 2.119
RUR
434[src]of 1.128
CWUR
459[src]of 1.929
ARWU
501[src]of 996
QS
751[src]of 1.462
SCImago
2.033[src]of 4.699
FWUR
705of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS12,4
  • THE20
  • ARWU11,3
  • CWUR15,2
  • RUR0,5
  • SCImago4,3

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
53,3ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
64,9QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
68,9CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #705 · 61.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
53.3
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
64.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
68.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 61.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#459
cwur.org
RUR2025
#434
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2033
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #723 → #1834 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲31#631QS▲21#721THE▼50#401ARWU#401CWUR▼15#436RUR▲2#432SCImago▼4#1834
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#203
2006#201
2007#203
2008#201
2009#201#723
2010#401#201#762
2011#451#201#819
2012#551#201#900
2013#551#251#201#965
2014#201#346#1058
2015#551#301#339#1085
2016#501#301#301#342#1043
2017#551#301#201#378#342#1159
2018#551#251#301#428#348#994
2019#581#301#392#362#553
2020#601#251#301#345#387#1453
2021#601#301#301#378#392#1462
2022#651#351#301#410#415#1432
2023#742#401#421#434#1830
2024#721#401#401#436#432#1834

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Vermont703.0
2Syracuse University717.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources