University of Maine

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1865
Type
Education
ROR
01adr0w49
FWUR Rank#968 globally (of 4.980)#183 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 49,8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 501–3.780 (3.279 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#731, most generous score) and SCImago (#3.780, harshest score).

ARWU
501[src]of 996
CWUR
731[src]of 1.929
SCImago
3.780[src]of 4.699
FWUR
968of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU0
  • CWUR12,4
  • SCImago30,2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
34,7ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
62,2CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #968 · 49.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
34.7
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
62.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 49.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#731
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#3780
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1585 → #3319 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼67#967QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU#501CWUR▼34#724RURNo dataSCImago▲952#3319
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#401
2006#401
2007#403
2008#402
2009#1585
2010#1519
2011#1614
2012#1585
2013#1613
2014#702#1702
2015#668#1952
2016#664#1548
2017#716#2157
2018#401#550#2121
2019#501#557#1301
2020#401#686#3458
2021#401#680#3660
2022#401#688#3725
2023#501#690#4271
2024#501#724#3319

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1The University of Alabama971.0
2Rochester Institute of Technology960.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources