University of KwaZulu-Natal

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
South Africa
Founded
2004
Type
Education
ROR
04qzfn040
FWUR Rank#573 globally (of 4.980)#6 in South Africa
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 66,9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 427–1.432 (1.005 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#501, most generous score) and ARWU (#601, harshest score).

RUR
427[src]of 1.128
THE
501[src]of 2.119
CWUR
505[src]of 1.929
QS
558[src]of 1.462
ARWU
601[src]of 996
SCImago
1.432[src]of 4.699
FWUR
573of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS5
  • THE9,5
  • ARWU27,1
  • CWUR7
  • RUR4,7
  • SCImago2,7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
54,7ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
69,2QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
68,1CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #573 · 66.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
54.7
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
69.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
68.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 66.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#505
cwur.org
RUR2025
#427
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1432
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #2063 → #1354 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲44#617QS▲344#621THE▼100#501ARWU#501CWUR▼5#483RUR▲46#442SCImago▲489#1354
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#401
2006#401
2007#403
2008#402
2009#402#2063
2010#401#433#2118
2011#601#401#418#2245
2012#551#401#476#2212
2013#501#351#401#441#2019
2014#401#459#455#1745
2015#501#401#478#475#1730
2016#551#401#401#467#572#1561
2017#651#501#401#445#443#1138
2018#701#401#501#402#427#1564
2019#751#401#401#424#434#598
2020#801#401#501#477#422#1432
2021#801#351#601#483#374#1605
2022#801#351#501#484#401#1544
2023#965#401#501#478#488#1843
2024#621#501#501#483#442#1354

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Johannesburg555.0
2University of Pretoria543.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources