University of Central Florida

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1963
Type
Education
ROR
036nfer12
FWUR Rank#570 globally (of 4.980)#127 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 67/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 401–846 (445 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#846, most generous score) and RUR (#749, harshest score).

THE
401[src]of 2.119
ARWU
401[src]of 996
CWUR
488[src]of 1.929
QS
701[src]of 1.462
RUR
749[src]of 1.128
SCImago
846[src]of 4.699
FWUR
570of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS14,8
  • THE14,2
  • ARWU7,1
  • CWUR7,8
  • RUR33,3
  • SCImago15,1

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
70,9ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
66,6QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
54,2CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #570 · 67
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
70.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
66.6
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
54.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 67 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#488
cwur.org
RUR2025
#749
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#846
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #417 → #703 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲26#549QS▲360#593THE▲200#401ARWU▼100#401CWUR#480RUR▲18#587SCImago▲204#703
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#401
2006#301
2007#305
2008#303
2009#201#417
2010#201#395#400
2011#201#415#424
2012#201#534#415
2013#201#531#430
2014#301#401#557#454
2015#301#394#570#562
2016#701#401#396#575#606
2017#701#301#406#540#514
2018#701#301#455#503#611
2019#751#601#301#450#518#415
2020#701#601#301#468#503#1034
2021#701#601#301#463#543#1071
2022#751#601#301#473#617#908
2023#953#601#301#480#605#907
2024#593#401#401#480#587#703

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Brandeis University572.0
2University of Florida Health574.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources