University of California, Riverside

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1954
Type
Education
ROR
03nawhv43
FWUR Rank#339 globally (of 4.980)#87 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 79,5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 201–836 (635 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#268, most generous score) and RUR (#430, harshest score).

ARWU
201[src]of 996
CWUR
268[src]of 1.929
THE
301[src]of 2.119
RUR
430[src]of 1.128
QS
440[src]of 1.462
SCImago
836[src]of 4.699
FWUR
339of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS9,5
  • THE6,4
  • ARWU0,4
  • CWUR6,7
  • RUR17,5
  • SCImago2,7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
81,1ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
77,9QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
74,1CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #339 · 79.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
81.1
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
77.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
74.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 79.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#268
cwur.org
RUR2025
#430
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#836
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #282 → #719 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲6#317QS▲49#404THE#251ARWU#201CWUR▼11#263RUR▼37#406SCImago▼64#719
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#101
2006#102
2007#102
2008#101
2009#101#282
2010#285#101#197#274
2011#325#117#102#189#278
2012#303#143#101#234#309
2013#268#154#101#261#318
2014#148#101#222#252#323
2015#261#150#101#214#255#348
2016#265#167#151#217#231#459
2017#271#165#151#218#451
2018#323#198#151#245#451
2019#384#201#151#204#275
2020#454#251#201#242#645
2021#449#251#201#242#260#631
2022#403#251#201#249#299#587
2023#453#251#201#252#369#655
2024#404#251#201#263#406#719

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Stony Brook University341.0
2University of Missouri344.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources