Universitetet i Stavanger

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Norway
Founded
2005
Type
Education
ROR
02qte9q33
FWUR Rank#1.439 globally (of 4.980)#6 in Norway
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 37,7/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–3.295 (2.694 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#601, most generous score) and SCImago (#3.295, harshest score).

THE
601[src]of 2.035
QS
851[src]of 1.462
CWUR
1.282[src]of 1.929
SCImago
3.295[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.439of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS8,3
  • CWUR0
  • SCImago3,7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
29,9SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
56,2QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
33,6CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,439 · 37.7
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
29.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
56.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
33.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 37.7 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR2025
#1282
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#3295
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2114 → #3206 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼145#1598QS#1401THE▼100#601ARWUNo dataCWUR▼25#1340RURNo dataSCImago▼78#3206
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2114
2010#2190
2011#2186
2012#2150
2013#1926
2014#1817
2015#1878
2016#1705
2017#2303
2018#2981
2019#1440#1549
2020#1404#3589
2021#1360#3527
2022#401#1307#3375
2023#501#1315#3128
2024#1401#601#1340#3206

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1OsloMet1612.0
2Norwegian University of Life Sciences995.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources