Universidade de Coimbra

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Portugal
Founded
1290
Type
Education
ROR
04z8k9a98
FWUR Rank#354 globally (of 4.980)#3 in Portugal
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 78,6/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 224–888 (664 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#888, most generous score) and ARWU (#501, harshest score).

RUR
224[src]of 1.128
QS
347[src]of 1.462
THE
401[src]of 2.119
CWUR
449[src]of 1.929
ARWU
501[src]of 996
SCImago
888[src]of 4.699
FWUR
354of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS2,3
  • THE2,5
  • ARWU28,8
  • CWUR1,8
  • RUR1,6
  • SCImago2,5

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
65,5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
78,7QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
78,5CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #354 · 78.6
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
65.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
78.7
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
78.5
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 78.6 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#449
cwur.org
RUR2025
#224
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#888
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #1239 → #959 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲56#374QS▲88#351THE▲200#401ARWU▼100#501CWUR▼22#442RUR▼3#259SCImago▼11#959
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1239
2010#396#397#1113
2011#394#401#997
2012#385#350#404#869
2013#358#401#447#746
2014#401#545#489#652
2015#351#401#507#482#640
2016#367#401#401#481#401#627
2017#451#401#401#457#303#631
2018#401#501#501#403#312#797
2019#407#501#501#416#330#394
2020#406#601#501#408#316#927
2021#431#601#501#407#297#846
2022#455#601#501#413#366#845
2023#439#601#401#420#256#948
2024#351#401#501#442#259#959

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Universidade do Porto280.0
2Universidade de Lisboa272.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources