Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
South Korea
Founded
2007
Type
Education
ROR
017cjz748
FWUR Rank#376 globally (of 4.980)#9 in South Korea
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 77,1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 201–1.061 (860 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#201, most generous score) and ARWU (#301, harshest score).

THE
201[src]of 2.119
ARWU
301[src]of 996
QS
310[src]of 1.462
CWUR
481[src]of 1.929
SCImago
1.061[src]of 4.699
FWUR
376of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS1,7
  • THE13,4
  • ARWU7,3
  • CWUR2
  • SCImago0,3

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
73,7ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
84,7QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
75,1CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #376 · 77.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
73.7
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
84.7
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
75.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 77.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#481
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#1061
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

CWUR climbed #973 → #481 (2015–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼55#329QS▼68#266THE▼25#199ARWU#201CWUR▲4#481RURNo dataSCImago▼111#961
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012#1073
2013#1078
2014#1082
2015#973#988
2016#886#1025
2017#401#746#463
2018#201#301#775#614
2019#201#301#535#338
2020#201#401#554#794
2021#176#301#528#696
2022#212#178#201#503#881
2023#198#174#201#485#850
2024#266#199#201#481#961

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Korea University of Science and Technology427.0
2Kyung Hee University317.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources