Tianjin University of Technology

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
China
Founded
1978
Type
Education
ROR
00zbe0w13
FWUR Rank#1.621 globally (of 4.980)#217 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 30,1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 701–3.285 (2.584 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#917, most generous score) and ARWU (#701, harshest score).

ARWU
701[src]of 996
CWUR
917[src]of 1.929
SCImago
3.285[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.621of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU0,4
  • CWUR22,4
  • SCImago0

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
29,9ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
52,5CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,621 · 30.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
29.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
52.5
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 30.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#917
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#3285
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3840 → #3012 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼232#1199QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▲44#982RURNo dataSCImago▼765#3012
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3840
2010#3912
2011#4007
2012#4084
2013#3942
2014#3602
2015#3426
2016#3557
2017#2677
2018#2243
2019#1398#1549
2020#1265#3206
2021#1188#2793
2022#901#1080#3441
2023#801#1026#2247
2024#982#3012

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Zhejiang Forestry University1625.0
2Guangdong Medical University1608.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources