Temple University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1884
Type
Education
ROR
00kx1jb78
FWUR Rank#428 globally (of 4.980)#103 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 74,4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 278–721 (443 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#688, most generous score) and QS (#721, harshest score).

RUR
278[src]of 1.128
CWUR
364[src]of 1.929
THE
401[src]of 2.119
ARWU
401[src]of 996
SCImago
688[src]of 4.699
QS
721[src]of 1.462
FWUR
428of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS23,6
  • THE6,7
  • ARWU14,6
  • CWUR6,8
  • RUR1
  • SCImago11

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
72,6ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
65,9QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
78,3CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #428 · 74.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
72.6
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
65.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
78.3
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 74.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#364
cwur.org
RUR2025
#278
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#688
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

QS fell #451 → #721 (2010–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼25#406QS▲61#721THE▼50#351ARWU#401CWUR▲6#347RUR▲26#209SCImago▼4#588
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#301
2006#301
2007#305
2008#303
2009#303#360
2010#451#301#372
2011#501#301#403
2012#551#301#396
2013#551#351#301#275#366
2014#351#301#390#301#343
2015#601#301#381#261#379
2016#601#351#301#380#230#396
2017#651#301#301#396#232#313
2018#651#351#301#341#233#433
2019#651#351#301#348#203#214
2020#651#301#301#352#210#425
2021#701#301#501#352#203#465
2022#751#301#401#351#233#473
2023#782#301#401#353#235#584
2024#721#351#401#347#209#588

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Washington State University432.0
2University of South Carolina423.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources