Teesside University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United Kingdom
Founded
1930
Type
Education
ROR
03z28gk75
FWUR Rank#935 globally (of 4.980)#60 in United Kingdom
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 30,3/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–3.276 (2.675 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#601, most generous score) and RUR (#996, harshest score).

THE
601[src]of 2.119
RUR
996[src]of 1.139
SCImago
3.276[src]of 4.699
FWUR
935of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE20,7
  • SCImago20,7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
30,3SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
71,7THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
12,6RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2023/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #935 · 30.3
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
30.3
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
71.7
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
12.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 30.3 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR
RUR2023
#996
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#3276
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

THE fell #601 → #1001 (2017–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲471#1223QSNo dataTHE#1001ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▲286#2966
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2666
2010#2673
2011#2619
2012#2546
2013#2832
2014#2887
2015#688#2535
2016#557#2013
2017#601#624#3606
2018#601#637#4086
2019#801#671#2107
2020#801#3898
2021#801#4061
2022#1001#3722
2023#1001#996#3252
2024#1001#2966

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Huddersfield930.0
2Courtauld Institute of Art943.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources