Technological University, Maubin

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Myanmar
Type
Education
ROR
03ed4e029
FWUR Rank#1.319 globally (of 4.980)#2 in Myanmar
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 36,6/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 851–3.243 (2.392 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1.201, most generous score) and CWUR (#1.899, harshest score).

QS
851[src]of 1.469
THE
1.201[src]of 2.119
CWUR
1.899[src]of 1.928
SCImago
3.243[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.319of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE6,2
  • SCImago6,2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
31SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
42,8QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
1,6CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2021/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,319 · 36.6
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
31
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
42.8
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
1.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 36.6 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR2021
#1899
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#3243
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

QS fell #551 → #851 (2015–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲13#1181QS▲59#851THE#1001ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago#2653
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015#551
2016#601
2017#651
2018#651
2019#751#1653
2020#751#801#1773
2021#801#801#1899
2022#801#1001
2023#910#1001
2024#851#1001#2653

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Kyaingtong University673.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources