Taiyuan University of Technology

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
China
Founded
1902
Type
Education
ROR
03kv08d37
FWUR Rank#950 globally (of 4.980)#149 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 50,3/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–1.532 (931 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#1.532, most generous score) and RUR (#955, harshest score).

ARWU
601[src]of 996
CWUR
756[src]of 1.929
RUR
955[src]of 1.128
SCImago
1.532[src]of 4.699
FWUR
950of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU10,6
  • CWUR10,6
  • RUR34,9
  • SCImago17,1

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
53,6ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
38,1CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #950 · 50.3
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
53.6
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
38.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 50.3 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#756
cwur.org
RUR2025
#955
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1532
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3735 → #1506 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲92#997QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU▲100#601CWUR▲25#818RUR▲245#868SCImago▼115#1506
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3735
2010#3751
2011#3818
2012#3818
2013#3563
2014#3365
2015#3146
2016#2449
2017#1546
2018#801#1534
2019#701#1067#1007
2020#701#1001#2181
2021#501#975#1800
2022#701#888#880#1578
2023#701#843#1113#1391
2024#601#818#868#1506

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources