Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Russian Federation
FWUR Rank#1.802 globally (of 4.980)#39 in Russian Federation
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 27,5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 819–8.474 (7.655 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1.501, most generous score) and SCImago (#8.474, harshest score).

RUR
819[src]of 1.128
THE
1.501[src]of 2.119
SCImago
8.474[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.802of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE1,7
  • RUR0
  • SCImago27,5

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
29,2THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
27,5RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,802 · 27.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
29.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
27.5
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 27.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR
RUR2025
#819
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#8474
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3736 → #7556 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲71#1666QSNo dataTHE#1201ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRUR▲106#764SCImago▼43#7556
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3736
2010#3997
2011#4227
2012#4397
2013#4445
2014#4474
2015#644#4347
2016#625#4622
2017#621#4400
2018#694#4525
2019#1001#676#3182
2020#1001#582#6337
2021#1001#561#6582
2022#1201#569#7237
2023#1201#870#7513
2024#1201#764#7556

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources