RMIT University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Australia
Founded
1887
Type
Education
ROR
04ttjf776
FWUR Rank#322 globally (of 4.980)#14 in Australia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 80,4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 125–677 (552 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#125, most generous score) and RUR (#626, harshest score).

QS
125[src]of 1.462
THE
251[src]of 2.119
ARWU
301[src]of 996
CWUR
424[src]of 1.929
RUR
626[src]of 1.128
SCImago
677[src]of 4.699
FWUR
322of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS11,1
  • THE7,8
  • ARWU10,6
  • CWUR2,4
  • RUR35,8
  • SCImago5,2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
77,7ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
89,9QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
61,3CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #322 · 80.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
77.7
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
89.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
61.3
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 80.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#424
cwur.org
RUR2025
#626
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#677
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #1210 → #778 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲23#340QS▲50#140THE▲50#251ARWU#301CWUR▲8#451RUR▲71#297SCImago▲117#778
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007#200
2008
2009#1210
2010#224#455#1208
2011#228#472#1223
2012#246#524#1148
2013#291#510#1096
2014#859#522#1048
2015#304#873#452#966
2016#273#401#401#869#413#819
2017#252#401#401#837#450#838
2018#247#401#301#634#426#908
2019#250#401#301#552#409#480
2020#238#351#301#547#352#998
2021#223#301#301#524#326#921
2022#206#301#301#482#368#910
2023#190#301#301#459#368#895
2024#140#251#301#451#297#778

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Queensland University of Technology328.0
2University of Wollongong304.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources