Rigas Stradina universitate

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Latvia
Founded
1950
Type
Education
ROR
03nadks56
FWUR Rank#1.511 globally (of 4.980)#1 in Latvia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 20,2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1.001–5.645 (4.644 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1.201, most generous score) and SCImago (#5.645, harshest score).

QS
1.001[src]of 1.462
RUR
1.040[src]of 1.139
THE
1.201[src]of 2.119
SCImago
5.645[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.511of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS0
  • THE11,8
  • SCImago31,6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
37,5QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
8,8RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2023/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,511 · 20.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
37.5
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
8.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 20.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR
RUR2023
#1040
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#5645
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3838 → #5375 (2015–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼205#1985QS▼11#901THE▼900#1501ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▲36#5375
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012#583
2013
2014#608
2015#666#3838
2016#516
2017
2018#3966
2019#801#1081
2020#801#2808
2021#801#2777
2022#801#501#3670
2023#890#601#1040#5411
2024#901#1501#5375

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Rigas Tehniska universitate1539.0
2Latvijas Universitate1917.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources