Pohang University of Science and Technology

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
South Korea
Founded
1986
Type
Education
ROR
04xysgw12
FWUR Rank#229 globally (of 4.980)#7 in South Korea
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 86,2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 39–978 (939 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#39, most generous score) and ARWU (#301, harshest score).

RUR
39[src]of 1.128
QS
102[src]of 1.462
THE
141[src]of 2.119
ARWU
301[src]of 996
CWUR
407[src]of 1.929
SCImago
978[src]of 4.699
FWUR
229of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS6,9
  • THE7,2
  • ARWU16,3
  • CWUR7,2
  • RUR10,5
  • SCImago7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
74,5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
93,2QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
87,8CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #229 · 86.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
74.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
93.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
87.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 86.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#407
cwur.org
SCImago2025
#978
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #433 → #917 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼6#220QS▼29#100THE▲14#149ARWU#301CWUR▼11#402RUR▲57#41SCImago▼80#917
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#301
2006#301
2007#305
2008#188#303
2009#134#303#433
2010#112#301#457
2011#98#28#301#429
2012#97#53#301#50#397
2013#107#50#301#41#357
2014#87#60#301#186#53#346
2015#86#66#301#165#51#331
2016#87#116#201#191#39#506
2017#83#104#301#212#30#345
2018#71#137#401#348#410
2019#83#142#401#340#33#259
2020#87#146#301#362#34#669
2021#77#151#401#368#35#606
2022#81#185#301#387#32#802
2023#71#163#301#391#98#837
2024#100#149#301#402#41#917

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Hanyang University221.0
2Sungkyunkwan University153.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources