Orta Dogu Teknik Üniversitesi

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Türkiye
Founded
1956
Type
Education
ROR
014weej12
FWUR Rank#466 globally (of 4.980)#2 in Türkiye
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 61,8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 269–3.264 (2.995 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#351, most generous score) and ARWU (#901, harshest score).

QS
269[src]of 1.462
RUR
320[src]of 1.128
THE
351[src]of 2.119
CWUR
709[src]of 1.929
ARWU
901[src]of 996
SCImago
3.264[src]of 4.699
FWUR
466of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS9,4
  • THE11,3
  • CWUR8,9
  • RUR0,5
  • SCImago41,7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
20,1ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
82,6QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
67,5CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2022/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #466 · 61.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
20.1
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
82.6
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
67.5
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 61.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#709
cwur.org
RUR2025
#320
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#3264
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1565 → #3063 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲115#432QS▲169#336THE▲150#351ARWUNo dataCWUR▼58#685RUR▲194#188SCImago▲594#3063
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1565
2010#356#1512
2011#501#183#1384
2012#451#276#409#1303
2013#431#201#337#1111
2014#201#396#375#1141
2015#401#85#470#308#1227
2016#431#501#525#341#1258
2017#471#601#701#498#407#1172
2018#471#601#801#596#437#1634
2019#551#601#701#582#471#936
2020#591#601#801#571#454#2446
2021#601#801#901#573#425#2803
2022#551#601#901#595#336#3212
2023#505#501#627#382#3657
2024#336#351#685#188#3063

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Alanya Hamdullah Emin Pasa Üniversitesi439.0
2Bogaziçi Üniversitesi650.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources