Nova Southeastern University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1964
Type
Education
ROR
042bbge36
FWUR Rank#2.310 globally (of 4.980)#292 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 10,8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1.001–4.659 (3.658 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1.001, most generous score) and SCImago (#4.659, harshest score).

THE
1.001[src]of 2.119
QS
1.401[src]of 1.469
CWUR
1.605[src]of 1.929
SCImago
4.659[src]of 4.699
FWUR
2.310of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE36
  • CWUR0
  • SCImago16

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0,9SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
28,8QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
16,8CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,310 · 10.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
28.8
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
16.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 10.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR2025
#1605
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#4659
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2670 → #4045 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼166#2080QS▲58#1201THE▼400#801ARWUNo dataCWUR▼39#1536RURNo dataSCImago▼400#4045
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2670
2010#2733
2011#2633
2012#2705
2013#3010
2014#3217
2015#3091
2016#3699
2017#3094
2018#2306
2019#1241#1067
2020#301#1386#2820
2021#251#1453#2563
2022#301#1503#3137
2023#1259#401#1497#3645
2024#1201#801#1536#4045

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1California State University, Northridge2308.0
2United States Military Academy2330.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources