Nanyang Technological University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Singapore
Founded
1991
Type
Education
ROR
02e7b5302
FWUR Rank#75 globally (of 4.980)#2 in Singapore
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 95,1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 12–157 (145 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#12, most generous score) and RUR (#157, harshest score).

QS
12[src]of 1.462
THE
31[src]of 2.119
ARWU
88[src]of 996
SCImago
130[src]of 4.699
CWUR
132[src]of 1.929
RUR
157[src]of 1.128
FWUR
75of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS4,2
  • THE3,5
  • ARWU3,8
  • CWUR1,9
  • RUR8,9
  • SCImago2,2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
94,3ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
98,9QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
89,7CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #75 · 95.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
94.3
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
98.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
89.7
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 95.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#132
cwur.org
RUR2025
#157
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#130
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

ARWU climbed #301 → #90 (2005–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#30020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲1#75QS▼7#26THE▲4#32ARWU▲3#90CWUR#133RUR▼7#128SCImago▼12#113
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#301
2006#301
2007#69#305
2008#77#303
2009#73#303#159
2010#74#301#206#151
2011#58#174#201#183#144
2012#47#169#201#219#129
2013#41#86#201#206#113
2014#39#76#151#148#178#99
2015#39#61#151#135#128#98
2016#13#55#101#134#118#98
2017#13#54#101#107#87#51
2018#11#52#96#173#73#60
2019#12#51#73#130#60#50
2020#11#48#91#140#57#90
2021#13#47#81#136#34#86
2022#12#46#88#133#55#96
2023#19#36#93#133#121#101
2024#26#32#90#133#128#113

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1National University of Singapore40.0
2Singapore Management University608.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources