Nankai University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
China
Founded
1919
Type
Education
ROR
01y1kjr75
FWUR Rank#193 globally (of 4.980)#25 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 88,4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 112–355 (243 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#300, most generous score) and QS (#355, harshest score).

RUR
112[src]of 1.128
ARWU
151[src]of 996
CWUR
189[src]of 1.929
THE
251[src]of 2.119
SCImago
300[src]of 4.699
QS
355[src]of 1.462
FWUR
193of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS12,6
  • THE0,2
  • ARWU3,4
  • CWUR1,9
  • RUR1,8
  • SCImago5,2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
89,3ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
82QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
90,2CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #193 · 88.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
89.3
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
82
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
90.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 88.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#189
cwur.org
RUR2025
#112
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#300
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #1245 → #273 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲68#197QS▼5#384THE▲50#251ARWU#151CWUR▲7#203RUR▲191#114SCImago▼43#273
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007#403
2008#402
2009#402#1245
2010#401#1045
2011#401#401#860
2012#451#401#659
2013#363#401#558
2014#301#349#451
2015#328#301#315#437
2016#277#301#305#354
2017#315#301#284#234
2018#344#301#337#261
2019#338#351#201#286#302#187
2020#368#351#201#254#268#316
2021#377#351#201#249#270#274
2022#358#301#201#228#276#298
2023#379#301#151#210#305#230
2024#384#251#151#203#114#273

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Beihang University197.0
2South China University of Technology188.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources