Michigan State University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1855
Type
Education
ROR
05hs6h993
FWUR Rank#172 globally (of 4.980)#55 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 89,6/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 105–352 (247 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#105, most generous score) and ARWU (#151, harshest score).

THE
105[src]of 2.119
ARWU
151[src]of 996
QS
161[src]of 1.462
CWUR
165[src]of 1.929
RUR
167[src]of 1.128
SCImago
352[src]of 4.699
FWUR
172of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS0,5
  • THE5,5
  • ARWU4,7
  • CWUR1,9
  • RUR4,3
  • SCImago2,9

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
88,7ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
92,1QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
88,4CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #172 · 89.6
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
88.7
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
92.1
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
88.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 89.6 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#165
cwur.org
RUR2025
#167
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#352
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #140 → #271 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#30020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼13#152QS▲23#136THE▼10#116ARWU#151CWUR▼8#159RUR▼41#170SCImago▼68#271
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#77
2006#80
2007#159#80
2008#83
2009#86#140
2010#208#86#94#155
2011#164#122#92#113#160
2012#174#96#96#104#164
2013#171#94#92#124#170
2014#195#83#101#112#100#178
2015#195#82#99#118#106#185
2016#164#99#101#106#103#181
2017#160#101#101#130#81#170
2018#149#83#101#144#101#191
2019#141#93#101#153#111#129
2020#144#84#101#150#123#247
2021#157#105#101#146#124#213
2022#157#93#151#150#142#171
2023#159#106#151#151#129#203
2024#136#116#151#159#170#271

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Texas A&M University175.0
2Rutgers University–New Brunswick176.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources