Louisiana State University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1860
Type
Education
ROR
05ect4e57
FWUR Rank#539 globally (of 4.980)#124 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 68,6/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 317–1.361 (1.044 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#381, most generous score) and QS (#851, harshest score).

RUR
317[src]of 1.128
CWUR
381[src]of 1.929
ARWU
401[src]of 996
THE
601[src]of 2.119
QS
851[src]of 1.462
SCImago
1.361[src]of 4.699
FWUR
539of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS26,8
  • THE3
  • ARWU8,8
  • CWUR11,7
  • RUR3,3
  • SCImago2,4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
65,4ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
56,8QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
76,1CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #539 · 68.6
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
65.4
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
56.8
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
76.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 68.6 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#381
cwur.org
RUR2025
#317
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1361
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #558 → #1148 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼32#559QS▲60#801THE#601ARWU#401CWUR▲18#366RUR▼8#336SCImago▲147#1148
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#203
2006#201
2007#203
2008#201
2009#201#558
2010#151#542
2011#451#151#575
2012#501#201#565
2013#501#201#528
2014#201#216#528
2015#501#201#332#355#550
2016#601#401#301#188#315#543
2017#651#501#301#191#304#651
2018#651#401#301#219#296#768
2019#651#501#301#289#320#464
2020#651#501#301#293#286#1187
2021#701#501#501#302#342#1229
2022#801#601#401#377#403#1158
2023#861#601#401#384#328#1295
2024#801#601#401#366#336#1148

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1The University of Texas at Dallas545.0
2University of Alabama at Birmingham528.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources