Leibniz Universität Hannover

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Germany
Founded
1831
Type
Education
ROR
0304hq317
FWUR Rank#565 globally (of 4.980)#38 in Germany
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 65,2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 351–1.927 (1.576 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#351, most generous score) and SCImago (#1.927, harshest score).

THE
351[src]of 2.119
ARWU
401[src]of 996
QS
433[src]of 1.462
RUR
434[src]of 1.062
CWUR
556[src]of 1.929
SCImago
1.927[src]of 4.699
FWUR
565of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS3,3
  • THE16,3
  • ARWU7,3
  • CWUR4,1
  • SCImago8,2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
59,4ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
77QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
65,2CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2024/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #565 · 65.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
59.4
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
77
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
65.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 65.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#556
cwur.org
RUR2024
#434
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1927
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1029 → #1712 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼17#613QS▲136#481THE▲50#351ARWU▲100#401CWUR▼58#566RUR▼16#434SCImago▼41#1712
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007#403
2008#402
2009#402#1029
2010#451#401#177#1034
2011#451#401#182#968
2012#401#350#401#223#871
2013#451#351#401#210#791
2014#351#401#272#768
2015#421#401#356#617
2016#366#301#401#326#646
2017#400#351#401#403#913
2018#401#351#401#393#1036
2019#551#401#501#493#398#598
2020#651#401#601#500#281#1305
2021#651#501#601#490#402#1525
2022#601#401#501#497#376#1657
2023#617#401#501#508#418#1671
2024#481#351#401#566#434#1712

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Ernst Moritz Arndt Universität Greifswald569.0
2Universität Konstanz580.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources