Jacobs University Bremen

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Germany
Founded
2001
Type
Education
ROR
02yrs2n53
FWUR Rank#2.646 globally (of 4.980)#78 in Germany
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 14,4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 501–4.099 (3.598 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#501, most generous score) and SCImago (#4.099, harshest score).

THE
501[src]of 2.119
CWUR
1.652[src]of 1.929
SCImago
4.099[src]of 4.699
FWUR
2.646of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE62
  • CWUR0
  • SCImago1,6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
12,8SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
76,4THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
14,4CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,646 · 14.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
12.8
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
76.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
14.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 14.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1652
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#4099
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #792 → #3501 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼146#1736QSNo dataTHE▲100#401ARWUNo dataCWUR▼11#1427RURNo dataSCImago▼357#3501
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#792
2010#778
2011#737
2012#755
2013#732
2014#879
2015#787#888
2016#762#895
2017#759#1240
2018#946#1274
2019#251#1007#727
2020#301#1125#1652
2021#251#1158#2087
2022#401#1284#3073
2023#501#1416#3144
2024#401#1427#3501

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Universität der Bundeswehr München2694.0
2Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg2795.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources