Iowa State University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1858
Type
Education
ROR
04rswrd78
FWUR Rank#351 globally (of 4.980)#90 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 76,5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 200–676 (476 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#200, most generous score) and ARWU (#401, harshest score).

CWUR
200[src]of 1.929
RUR
228[src]of 756
THE
401[src]of 2.119
ARWU
401[src]of 996
QS
449[src]of 1.462
SCImago
676[src]of 4.699
FWUR
351of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS9,3
  • THE2,4
  • ARWU18,9
  • CWUR11
  • SCImago6,9

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
72,7ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
75,2QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
79,8CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2017/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #351 · 76.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
72.7
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
75.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
79.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 76.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#200
cwur.org
RUR2017
#228
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#676
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

ARWU fell #153 → #501 (2005–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲45#324QS▲83#400THE▲50#351ARWU▼100#501CWUR▼11#193RURNo dataSCImago▼36#578
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#153
2006#151
2007#151
2008#152
2009#152#236
2010#275#151#202#252
2011#289#156#151#196#275
2012#319#184#151#231#281
2013#321#193#151#240#294
2014#183#151#182#208#294
2015#348#193#151#187#168#299
2016#355#251#201#205#175#310
2017#421#351#201#211#228#297
2018#471#301#201#177#352
2019#489#351#201#173#242
2020#511#351#201#173#521
2021#541#401#301#167#557
2022#494#401#501#174#499
2023#483#401#401#182#542
2024#400#351#501#193#578

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of California, Santa Cruz358.0
2University of Missouri344.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources