Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
India
Founded
1959
Type
Education
ROR
05pjsgx75
FWUR Rank#775 globally (of 4.980)#10 in India
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 57,4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 222–3.261 (3.039 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#222, most generous score) and SCImago (#3.261, harshest score).

QS
222[src]of 1.462
RUR
273[src]of 1.128
THE
601[src]of 1.386
ARWU
601[src]of 996
CWUR
829[src]of 1.929
SCImago
3.261[src]of 4.699
FWUR
775of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS27,3
  • ARWU17,8
  • CWUR0,5
  • RUR18,3
  • SCImago27

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
35,2ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
70,8QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
66,5CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2020/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #775 · 57.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
35.2
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
70.8
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
66.5
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 57.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#829
cwur.org
RUR2025
#273
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#3261
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1196 → #2434 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼31#764QS▼14#278THENo dataARWU#901CWUR▼19#842RUR▼24#307SCImago▲303#2434
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1196
2010#249#1262
2011#306#1315
2012#278#173#1406
2013#295#1528
2014#351#569#311#1630
2015#300#714#321#1643
2016#271#501#767#270#1555
2017#302#401#831#324#1312
2018#293#501#801#798#326#1858
2019#283#501#601#830#315#1024
2020#291#601#901#830#321#2744
2021#350#818#334#2756
2022#277#834#321#2613
2023#264#901#823#283#2737
2024#278#901#842#307#2434

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1VIT University792.0
2Jawaharlal Nehru University809.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources