Heriot-Watt University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United Kingdom
Founded
1821
Type
Education
ROR
04mghma93
FWUR Rank#546 globally (of 4.980)#41 in United Kingdom
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 68,4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 287–1.947 (1.660 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#401, most generous score) and ARWU (#701, harshest score).

QS
287[src]of 1.462
RUR
312[src]of 1.128
THE
401[src]of 2.119
ARWU
701[src]of 996
CWUR
735[src]of 1.929
SCImago
1.947[src]of 4.699
FWUR
546of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS12,1
  • THE12,8
  • ARWU38,6
  • CWUR6,4
  • RUR4,1
  • SCImago9,8

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
44,2ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
80,8QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
67,2CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #546 · 68.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
44.2
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
80.8
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
67.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 68.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#735
cwur.org
RUR2025
#312
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1947
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1215 → #2539 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼128#625QS▲47#235THE▲150#351ARWU▲100#801CWUR▼27#727RUR▲13#312SCImago▼1080#2539
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1215
2010#356#290#1186
2011#401#324#1215
2012#388#350#315#1161
2013#369#351#392#1192
2014#301#703#332#1162
2015#352#707#370#1049
2016#318#401#693#329#1094
2017#327#401#401#670#425#1208
2018#312#351#401#764#320#1528
2019#302#301#501#656#340#722
2020#314#251#701#690#313#1599
2021#301#351#801#699#255#1572
2022#270#501#801#706#352#1537
2023#282#501#901#700#325#1459
2024#235#351#801#727#312#2539

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Kent534.0
2Swansea University508.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources