Haverford College

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1833
Type
Education
ROR
04fnrxr62
FWUR Rank#1.609 globally (of 4.980)#245 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 9,5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 760–5.912 (5.152 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#760, most generous score) and SCImago (#5.912, harshest score).

CWUR
760[src]of 1.929
ARWU
901[src]of 995
SCImago
5.912[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.609of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR30,3
  • SCImago30,3

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
4,8ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
60,7CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2021/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,609 · 9.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
4.8
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
60.7
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 9.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#760
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#5912
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2903 → #5047 (2012–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼65#1521QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▼8#710RURNo dataSCImago▼2#5047
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012#2903
2013#3081
2014
2015#3768
2016#3688
2017#2922
2018#901#2845
2019#801#1155#1840
2020#801#575#3118
2021#901#592#3390
2022#659#4702
2023#702#5045
2024#710#5047

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of North Dakota1590.0
2Loma Linda University1629.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources