Dublin Institute of Technology

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Ireland
Type
Education
ROR
029nmgq20
FWUR Rank#2.283 globally (of 4.980)#8 in Ireland
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 31,4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 501–2.201 (1.700 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#2.201, most generous score) and RUR (#929, harshest score).

QS
501[src]of 683
THE
801[src]of 1.251
RUR
929[src]of 1.128
SCImago
2.201[src]of 4.019
FWUR
2.283of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • RUR0

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
45,3SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
31,4QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
17,7RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2013/2019/2021/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,283 · 31.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
45.3
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
31.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
17.7
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 31.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR
RUR2025
#929
roundranking.com
SCImago2021
#2201
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1647 → #2201 (2009–2021)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼30#1812QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRUR▲74#811SCImagoNo data
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1647
2010#395#504#1507
2011#401#507#1526
2012#451#538#1672
2013#501#583#1625
2014#1948
2015#654#2153
2016#601#544#2544
2017#601#597#2201
2018#601#617#2329
2019#801#708#1057
2020#694#1952
2021#725#2201
2022#814
2023#885
2024#811

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Maynooth University1293.0
2University of Limerick806.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources