Chengdu University of Technology

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
China
Founded
1956
Type
Education
ROR
05pejbw21
FWUR Rank#1.235 globally (of 4.980)#181 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 39,8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–2.952 (2.351 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#1.079, most generous score) and SCImago (#2.952, harshest score).

ARWU
601[src]of 996
CWUR
1.079[src]of 1.929
SCImago
2.952[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.235of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU0
  • CWUR4,4
  • SCImago2,6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
38,5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
44,1CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,235 · 39.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
38.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
44.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 39.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#1079
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#2952
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

CWUR climbed #1716 → #1229 (2019–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲292#1604QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU▲100#701CWUR▲85#1229RURNo dataSCImago▲216#3707
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3973
2010#4154
2011#4285
2012#4370
2013#4373
2014#4325
2015#4113
2016#3783
2017#3656
2018#3675
2019#1716#2876
2020#1603#5862
2021#1601#5478
2022#1414#5058
2023#801#1314#3923
2024#701#1229#3707

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Henan University of Science and Technology1236.0
2Xinjiang University1240.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources