Chalmers tekniska högskola

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Sweden
Founded
1829
Type
Education
ROR
040wg7k59
FWUR Rank#240 globally (of 4.980)#7 in Sweden
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 85,3/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 109–837 (728 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#201, most generous score) and ARWU (#301, harshest score).

RUR
109[src]of 1.128
QS
165[src]of 1.462
THE
201[src]of 2.119
ARWU
301[src]of 996
CWUR
392[src]of 1.929
SCImago
837[src]of 4.699
FWUR
240of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS3,5
  • THE5,3
  • ARWU15,4
  • CWUR5,6
  • RUR5,1
  • SCImago3,1

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
76ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
89,7QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
85,1CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #240 · 85.3
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
76
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
89.7
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
85.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 85.3 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#392
cwur.org
RUR2025
#109
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#837
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #475 → #770 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲7#219QS▼4#129THE▲62#189ARWU#401CWUR▲7#385RUR▲32#71SCImago▼47#770
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#203
2006#201
2007#197#203
2008#162#201
2009#198#303#475
2010#204#201#105#487
2011#202#201#138#514
2012#223#226#301#200#518
2013#202#226#301#238#506
2014#176#276#301#395#213#478
2015#175#276#301#402#87#503
2016#132#201#201#444#72#458
2017#139#251#201#449#74#469
2018#133#201#201#464#69#542
2019#128#201#301#377#53#301
2020#125#251#301#407#66#628
2021#139#201#401#400#49#667
2022#121#251#401#399#113#731
2023#125#251#401#392#103#723
2024#129#189#401#385#71#770

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Göteborgs universitet206.0
2Stockholms universitet158.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources