Ceské vysoké ucení technické v Praze

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Czechia
Founded
1707
Type
Education
ROR
03kqpb082
FWUR Rank#1.013 globally (of 4.980)#4 in Czechia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 47,9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 416–3.003 (2.587 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#416, most generous score) and ARWU (#801, harshest score).

QS
416[src]of 1.462
CWUR
691[src]of 1.929
ARWU
801[src]of 996
THE
1.201[src]of 2.119
SCImago
3.003[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.013of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS23,7
  • THE4,5
  • ARWU28,2
  • CWUR16,3
  • SCImago11,8

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
27,9ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
57,5QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
64,2CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,013 · 47.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
27.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
57.5
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
64.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 47.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#691
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#3003
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

THE fell #501 → #1001 (2016–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲27#898QS▼76#454THE▲200#1001ARWU#801CWUR▼49#686RURNo dataSCImago▼199#2464
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2390
2010#401#2356
2011#501#2358
2012#501#2136
2013#451#1732
2014#771#1521
2015#411#716#1328
2016#451#501#663#869
2017#501#601#601#661#1298
2018#491#601#601#667#1620
2019#531#801#701#652#784
2020#498#801#701#609#2182
2021#432#1001#801#594#2020
2022#403#1001#801#619#2025
2023#378#1201#801#637#2265
2024#454#1001#801#686#2464

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources