Birkbeck, University of London

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
United Kingdom
Founded
1823
Type
Education
ROR
02mb95055
FWUR Rank#1.006 globally (of 4.980)#65 in United Kingdom
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 54,2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 301–3.710 (3.409 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#301, most generous score) and ARWU (#801, harshest score).

THE
301[src]of 2.119
RUR
397[src]of 1.128
QS
408[src]of 1.469
ARWU
801[src]of 996
CWUR
804[src]of 1.929
SCImago
3.710[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.006of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE37,7
  • ARWU28,4
  • CWUR10,3
  • RUR16,8
  • SCImago27

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
20,4ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
79,1QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
61,6CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,006 · 54.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
20.4
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
79.1
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
61.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 54.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#804
cwur.org
RUR2025
#397
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#3710
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1306 → #3015 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼242#783QS▼31#374THE▲50#301ARWU▲100#801CWUR▼10#757RUR▲17#422SCImago▼287#3015
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1306
2010#221#1350
2011#369#152#217#1294
2012#379#149#237#1250
2013#374#200#302#1376
2014#201#624#226#1440
2015#431#226#698#276#1361
2016#290#201#649#325#1402
2017#280#201#633#255#1941
2018#308#301#801#565#262#2041
2019#306#301#901#694#255#927
2020#328#351#901#681#2102
2021#344#351#716#279#2730
2022#332#351#738#342#2585
2023#343#351#747#439#2728
2024#374#301#801#757#422#3015

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Nottingham Trent University1015.0
2University of Brighton980.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources