Bharathidasan University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
India
Founded
1982
Type
Education
ROR
02w7vnb60
FWUR Rank#2.029 globally (of 4.980)#97 in India
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 0/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1.201–6.700 (5.499 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1.201, most generous score) and CWUR (#1.999, harshest score).

THE
1.201[src]of 2.119
CWUR
1.999[src]of 1.930
SCImago
6.700[src]of 4.699
FWUR
2.029of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE21,7
  • SCImago21,7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
43,4THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
0CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2023/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,029 · 0
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
43.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
0
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 0 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2023
#1999
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#6700
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2921 → #6253 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWURNo dataQSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▲397#6253
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2921
2010#2820
2011#2805
2012#2861
2013#3032
2014#3092
2015#3510
2016#3706
2017#2174
2018#2687
2019#1869#1762
2020#1947#3901
2021#5613
2022#1996#6691
2023#1999#6650
2024#6253

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Banasthali Vidyapith2028.0
2DIT University2033.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2University of OxfordInggris Raya5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources