VIT University

Updated 9 मई 2026
Country
India
Founded
2001
Type
Government
ROR
03qe98b42
FWUR Rank#792 globally (of 4,980)#11 in India
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 56.9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 501–1,121 (620 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#1,121, most generous score) and RUR (#660, harshest score).

ARWU
501[src]of 996
THE
601[src]of 2,119
RUR
660[src]of 1,128
CWUR
983[src]of 1,929
SCImago
1,121[src]of 4,699
FWUR
792of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE14.8
  • ARWU7.1
  • CWUR7.8
  • RUR15.3
  • SCImago19.3

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
63ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
71.7THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
45.3CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #792 · 56.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
63
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
71.7
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
45.3
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 56.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
CWUR2025
#983
cwur.org
RUR2025
#660
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1121
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3387 → #1407 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲276#848QSNo dataTHE▲200#601ARWU▲200#501CWUR▲165#1057RUR▲82#647SCImago▲626#1407
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3387
2010#3037
2011#2986
2012#3015
2013#3121
2014#2909
2015#2785
2016#2336
2017#801#643#1897
2018#801#705#2020
2019#801#901#1352#714#784
2020#801#801#1310#719#2197
2021#801#801#1281#669#2277
2022#801#601#1270#803#1998
2023#801#701#1222#729#2033
2024#601#501#1057#647#1407

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur775.0
2Jawaharlal Nehru University809.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityसंयुक्त राज्य1.0
2University of Oxfordयूनाइटेड किंगडम5.0
3Tsinghua Universityचीन17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources