Tulane University

Updated 9 मई 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1834
Type
Education
ROR
04vmvtb21
FWUR Rank#473 globally (of 4,980)#111 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 71.8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 114–1,415 (1,301 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#114, most generous score) and ARWU (#501, harshest score).

RUR
114[src]of 1,128
THE
401[src]of 2,119
CWUR
443[src]of 1,929
ARWU
501[src]of 996
QS
597[src]of 1,462
SCImago
1,415[src]of 4,699
FWUR
473of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS12.6
  • THE9.3
  • ARWU22
  • CWUR5.2
  • RUR18.1
  • SCImago1.9

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
59.9ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
70.2QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
83.5CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #473 · 71.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
59.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
70.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
83.5
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 71.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#443
cwur.org
RUR2025
#114
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1415
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #469 → #1171 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼20#456QS▼128#600THE▼50#401ARWU#501CWUR▲20#434RUR▲23#110SCImago▲284#1171
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#203
2006#301
2007#305
2008#303
2009#303#469
2010#239#301#531
2011#284#301#598
2012#309#201#301#97#712
2013#387#226#301#146#728
2014#226#301#234#126#720
2015#421#301#301#272#179#682
2016#491#251#288#187#648
2017#501#351#601#306#132#622
2018#451#351#601#429#141#787
2019#412#301#401#407#133#439
2020#419#301#601#425#236#1068
2021#414#301#601#441#134#1215
2022#436#401#601#453#264#1294
2023#472#351#501#454#133#1455
2024#600#401#501#434#110#1171

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Cincinnati472.0
2University of Maryland, Baltimore474.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of Oxfordयूनाइटेड किंगडम5.0
2Tsinghua Universityचीन17.0
3The University of Melbourneऑस्ट्रेलिया27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources