Texas Christian University

Updated 9 मई 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1873
Type
Education
ROR
054b0b564
FWUR Rank#2,281 globally (of 4,980)#290 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 17.8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 581–6,603 (6,022 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#581, most generous score) and SCImago (#6,603, harshest score).

RUR
581[src]of 1,128
CWUR
1,586[src]of 1,929
SCImago
6,603[src]of 4,699
FWUR
2,281of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR0
  • RUR30.7
  • SCImago17.8

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
33.2CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,281 · 17.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
33.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 17.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1586
cwur.org
RUR2025
#581
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#6603
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2257 → #6705 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼80#1782QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▼4#1455RUR▲66#599SCImago▲843#6705
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2257
2010#2260
2011#2365
2012#2416
2013#2529
2014#2869
2015#3185
2016#584#3205
2017#549#2031
2018#563#2387
2019#1416#569#1549
2020#1420#546#4485
2021#1491#533#6020
2022#1429#629#6578
2023#1451#665#7548
2024#1455#599#6705

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Pratt Institute2276.0
2University of South Alabama2266.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of Oxfordयूनाइटेड किंगडम5.0
2Tsinghua Universityचीन17.0
3The University of Melbourneऑस्ट्रेलिया27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources