Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Updated 9 मई 2026
Country
China
Founded
1916
Type
Education
ROR
00z27jk27
FWUR Rank#1,214 globally (of 4,980)#180 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 40.9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 724–2,002 (1,278 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#2,002, most generous score) and ARWU (#801, harshest score).

RUR
724[src]of 1,128
ARWU
801[src]of 996
CWUR
1,046[src]of 1,929
SCImago
2,002[src]of 4,699
FWUR
1,214of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU21.2
  • CWUR5
  • RUR5
  • SCImago16.6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
38.5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
40.9CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,214 · 40.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
38.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
40.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 40.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#1046
cwur.org
RUR2025
#724
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2002
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3626 → #1957 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼191#1265QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU#901CWUR▲59#1117RUR▼89#684SCImago▼449#1957
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3626
2010#3780
2011#3912
2012#3952
2013#3984
2014#3928
2015#3453
2016#2704
2017#1714
2018#1672
2019#1422#632
2020#1343#1430
2021#1305#510#1827
2022#1221#507#1735
2023#901#1176#595#1508
2024#901#1117#684#1957

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Zhejiang Chinese Medical University1209.0
2Zhejiang Gongshang University1197.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityसंयुक्त राज्य1.0
2University of Oxfordयूनाइटेड किंगडम5.0
3The University of Melbourneऑस्ट्रेलिया27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources