Poznan University of Technology

Updated 9 मई 2026
Country
Poland
Founded
1919
Type
Education
ROR
00p7p3302
FWUR Rank#1,818 globally (of 4,980)#30 in Poland
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 27/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1,001–3,536 (2,535 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#1,001, most generous score) and CWUR (#1,473, harshest score).

QS
1,001[src]of 1,462
CWUR
1,473[src]of 1,929
THE
1,501[src]of 2,119
SCImago
3,536[src]of 4,699
FWUR
1,818of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS4.6
  • THE2.2
  • CWUR3.3
  • SCImago2.2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
24.8SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
30.4QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
23.7CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,818 · 27
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
24.8
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
30.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
23.7
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 27 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR2025
#1473
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#3536
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1974 → #3630 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼100#1728QS▼117#1001THE#1201ARWUNo dataCWUR▼14#1522RURNo dataSCImago▲34#3630
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1974
2010#2177
2011#2290
2012#2148
2013#2057
2014#2068
2015#1703
2016#1765
2017#1710
2018#1763
2019#801#1446#949
2020#801#1493#2713
2021#801#1511#2993
2022#801#1201#1521#3223
2023#884#1201#1508#3664
2024#1001#1201#1522#3630

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityसंयुक्त राज्य1.0
2Tsinghua Universityचीन17.0
3The University of Melbourneऑस्ट्रेलिया27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources